House Republicans will hold this brazen weaponization of power accountable,” he finished, assuring that there is no doubt: the Republican Party is planting its flag in supporting a man already found guilty of other crimes. I, and every American who believes in the rule of law, stand with President Trump against this grave injustice. Joe Biden kept classified documents for decades. “It is unconscionable for a President to indict the leading candidate opposing him. “Today is indeed a dark day for the United States of America,” House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said on Twitter before the indictment was even unsealed. (At least to the last part, Lee is not entirely wrong: it is fundamentally at odds with American history to hold presidents accountable for their crimes-from Iran Contra, to our laundry list of war crimes and military invasions, to sexual harassment.) Senator Mike Lee did not even engage one ounce with the charges, instead saying, “The Biden administration’s actions can only be compared to the type of oppressive tactics routeinly seen in nations such as Venezuela, Bolivia, and Nicaragua, which are absolutely alien and unacceptable in America.” According to Lee, holding a former president accountable for holding secret documents and actively taking steps to hide them somehow “echoes despotism, making it fundamentally at odds with American democratic values.” Neither should Obama and definitely not Biden, but they all do, and they all have.” Nothing has indicated that every single former president or vice president has taken classified documents out of the White House upon departure those who have been found, including Mike Pence and President Biden, have promptly returned any documents found. “These are just thugs that are going after President Trump,” Representative Tim Burchett followed, technically calling the jury of Trump’s peers the pejorative. Read more about Cannon and her “reign of error” here. If she does oversee the case again, there’s no telling what breaks she’ll give Trump this time around. This time around, Trump’s case would still be heard by a jury, but Cannon would get to determine Trump’s sentence. Even by these standards and expectations, the panel took great pains to make it unusually clear that Cannon had not just made a few simple mistakes. By their very nature, appeals courts often criticize rulings made by lower court judges. At every point possible, the Eleventh Circuit highlighted the shortcomings in her analysis of precedent, the limited scope of her inquiries on factual matters, and the perfunctory way in which she applied the appropriate legal tests-all of which happened to tilt things in Trump’s favor. Much of the panel’s analysis is aimed at Trump’s specific arguments before it, but there is also a palpable disdain for Cannon’s handling of the case to this point. As The New Republic ’s Matt Ford previously explained,
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |